- Taken for granted - 21st April 2025
- In through the out door - 15th April 2025
- Baby talk - 14th April 2025
A controversial university in Wales where staff say they are âtoo frightened to talkâ publicly about what they claim is chaos, and has strengthened a code of practice on freedom of speech, proclaims winning “… the highly prestigious title of University of the Year 2021”, it has emerged.

Cardiff Metropolitan University (CMU) proudly declares the award by Times Higher Education (THE) despite the fact it has also advertised for a Deputy Vice-Chancellor (DVC) saying itâs another institution, and used the wrong logo with picture.
The irony of the award appears to echo a comment from the Queen in 1992 that it had been an “annus horribilis” (Latin for ‘horrible year’) after publication of intimate conversations between Diana, the Princess of Wales, and James Gilbey from a tape recording of their phone calls, and a fire in Windsor Castle, one of the Queen’s official residences.

Leading academics in Wales are perplexed by the announcement, and one told The Eye: “If they are the best, what on earth are the worst like?!”
This however has not been the only award for CMU recently, and other ‘achievements’ of the contentious university were featured in the incorrect advert for a new DVC, when it explained it was for Cardiff University (CU), and published that institutionâs logo as well as photograph.
In the advert CMU announced that it âwas recently awarded the title of Welsh University of the Year 2021 by The Times and The Sunday Timesâ.
This time for the THE prize, the headline-grabbing Vice Chancellor (VC) Cara Aitchison, was clearly thrilled, and said: “The entire Cardiff Met community is absolutely delighted to have won what is widely regarded as one of the most significant awards in the UK Higher Education sector”.
There may be delight in some quarters, but documents tell another story, showing that, as well as publishing the wrong notice for a new senior staff member, the institution has also acknowledged it must do more to allow internal critics to speak out. Minutes of a âSPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORSâ given to The Eye, from March 11 2021 state clearly that the university seeks to âexplicitly strengthen the Universityâs commitment to freedom of speech and academic freedomâ. This then became official policy at CMU, with the declaration: âThe Board Resolved. 1) To approve the proposed Code of Practice on Freedom of Speechâ.
The latest worrying information of the THE award is set against other disturbing information, too, after we were contacted by numerous academics at CMU, that leading officials who have oversight of the institution are âturning a blind eye even though a grievance has gone straight to themâ. Our journalists have also received alarming complaints that the fresh people who have been brought in are of low calibre, and subservient to Professor Aitchison.


After a recent meeting of the Vice-Chancellor Executive Group (VCEG), unhappy staff were sent recruitment rules that every appointment panel must be chaired by a member of the group or a Dean of another school at the crisis-hit university.
Yet a âwhistleblowerâ at CMU says it is just further evidence of âmore controlling and lack of trustâ. One source added that it had become madness at the institution, saying:  âItâs starting to go mad againâ. The contact told The Eye earlier:  âI canât wait for the REF (Research Excellence Framework) results ⌠Research across the university is at an all time lowâ.

A spoof Twitter account was created which was widely followed by staff at CMU, and The Eye have shown previously how another source at CMU told us the atmosphere was âfeverishâ, while more than two and a half times the amount of money had been spent on legal fees compared with the year before, and the astonishing events at the university became a source of amusement for our satirical writer Edwin Phillips.
Meanwhile a number of staff who left had been required to sign âgaggingâ clauses. One angry former worker at CMU gave us the names of others who had sought their own legal advice, but in his words they âhave been shown the doorâ.

Another of our contacts at the university said to The Eye:  âIt has become obvious amongst all of us that anyone in CMU mentioning (The) Eye is immediately under suspicion for being one of your sources.  They are afraid of the truth about the shambles ⌠at CMU getting out into the mainstream media. Even UCU (University and College Union) colleagues are afraid to speak out which is indicative of the atmosphere here.â
Documents showed that at one point CMU had set an ambitious target of reaching a level of 26,425 students by 2023, while staff claimed they were under-resourced for an enlargement on this scale, and students were admitted who simply could not cope with degree work.
Yet, despite CMUâs proud announcement of the THE award, it seemed the massive changes at the university did little to improve its performance earlier. It was ranked 108 in The Times and The Sunday Times Good University Guide 2019 â which meant it had plunged 18 places in only a year, and one of our sources at CMU said it had ânose divedâ.

But our own inquiries of the university about the growing crisis under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) legislation, were met with a blanket refusal to provide answers.
As with our questions to another controversial Welsh higher education institution, officials at CMU have stated that the queries to them from our Editor Phil Parry were âvexatiousâ, although it was clear that all was not as it should be within CMU. We were given details of alleged âbullyingâ, and a different staff member got into trouble for ânot eating a sandwich within the designated lunch hourâ when officials from Human Resources were allegedly called in.

It all came as another internal document to staff at CMU, and passed to us, was condemned by one of our whistlebowers as âthe latest attempt by our Vice Chancellor to persuade us all that everything is going well and according to plan, but it certainly doesnât feel that wayâ.
A number of Professor Aitchisonâs staff had analysed the statistics given in the document and were deeply unimpressed. One told us:  âIn the VC news update there are some obvious discrepancies in some of the cherry-picked figures that any academic can spotâ. The source claimed there were major differences in anticipated turnover in the paper for 2018/19 to the statistic given in the Strategic Plan for CMU, and continued: âSo which figure is correct? The previously published strategic plan or the latest Pravda update?â.

A staff survey of Health and Wellbeing was carried out after we revealed it had been postponed, but the timing has been questioned by staff who claimed it was conducted following our disclosures. One told us:  â(The) Eye must have hit a nerve as the VC tells us that âone priority is to address any concerns raised by staff in the Staff Health and Wellbeing Survey conducted last monthââ.
Another of our sources criticised the knowledge of some staff now at CMU, saying:  âA five year old has more technological intellect than some C Met staff⌠a lot of staff think storing to cloud has something to do with the weather!â.

Yet others, who have been at the university for some time, were praised by the contact:Â âThere are some good staff being âtroddenâ all over. Â I see it happening all the time. Â (As for)Â media non-exposure, I guess BBC Wales will worry about âlinksâ they have with CMet and donât want bridges burntâ.
Even as the scandal at CMU has been kept from the mainstream media, The Eye have been inundated with desperate comments from distressed academics, and one said they are âdemoralised and demotivatedâ.

A contact told us earlier:  âStaffing levels are completely inadequate. Sickness levels and grievances are through the roof across the university.â Another of our sources within the Welsh university sector said:âThey are rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanicâ. A different unhappy academic has told us the university is in âturmoilâ and in a state of âcarnageâ.

The university responded to an earlier request for details under the FOIA completely denying information from one of our contacts that Professor Aitchison and her deputy had been placed on âsick leaveâ as the huge changes unfolded and the drive for more students came under fire from academics at CMU. We had also asked officials who now is in charge at the university amid accusations from the academics,that it is a ârudderless shipâ.
Normally responses to FOIA requests take several weeks, as in the case of the refusal on the grounds our questions were âvexatiousâ, but remarkably these denials came within hours, and CMU officials stressed that âProfessor Cara Aitchison ⌠is working normallyâ.

The questions were also sent to a senior official at CMU who is one of Professor Aitchisonâs acolytes marked âurgentâ but there has been no reply.
It may be viewed as ‘vexatious’, too, if an institution where staff say they are âtoo frightened to talkâ publicly about what they claim is chaos, and has strengthened a code of practice on freedom of speech, has been named ‘university of the year’…
Tomorrow – how, after 23 years with BBC Cymru Wales (BBC CW), and 38 years in journalism (when he was trained to use clear and simple language, avoiding jargon), Phil knows better than most, why an important rule of journalism is that the same story must not be repeated. However, an exception involves star actor Johnny Depp.
The memories of Phil’s astonishing decades-long award-winning career in journalism (including reporting ‘awards’ for controversial institutions) as he was gripped by the rare disabling condition Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP), have been released in a major book âA GOOD STORYâ. Order it now!Â
Regrettably publication of another book, however, was refused, because it was to have included names.


